Replaced libjpeg dependency on apt-get, it should be libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg8-dev.
On Debian 8...
```
Package libjpeg8-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
libjpeg62-turbo-dev
```
Using libjpeg-dev should make the OS select the most appropriate lib to be installed.
These are the packages available on Debian 8.
```
libjpeg-dev - Development files for the JPEG library [dummy package]
libjpeg-turbo-progs - Programs for manipulating JPEG files
libjpeg-turbo-progs-dbg - Programs for manipulating JPEG files (debugging symbols)
libjpeg62-turbo - libjpeg-turbo JPEG runtime library
libjpeg62-turbo-dbg - Debugging symbols for the libjpeg-turbo JPEG library
libjpeg62-turbo-dev - Development files for the libjpeg-turbo JPEG library
libturbojpeg1 - TurboJPEG runtime library - SIMD optimized
libturbojpeg1-dbg - TurboJPEG runtime library - SIMD optimized (debugging symbols)
libturbojpeg1-dev - Development files for the TurboJPEG library
```
This seems to work on all current Debian versions, Wheezy, Jessie and Sid.
https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libjpeg-devhttps://packages.debian.org/jessie/libjpeg-devhttps://packages.debian.org/stretch/libjpeg-dev
Im not sure if Ubuntu has this dummy package.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libjpeg-dev
Perhaps this should be further discussed.
libjpeg8-dev -> libjpeg-dev
Conflicts:
README.txt
- Add ability to explicitly reset NodeResolve state (useful for unittesting)
- Remove non-essential NodeResolve methods modifying state from INodeDefManager
- Add const qualifier to NodeDefManager and ContentFeatures serialize
This fixes the problem where 0.4.12-dev versions were erroneously shown as
0.4.11-dev because the tag was added on a separate branch. It also fixes a
similar issue when builders didn't fetch new tags when updating.
This also removes the number-of-commits-since-tag field, since it's
incompatible with this. Said field doesn't seem to be useful anyway if you
have the commit hash.
