189 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
189 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
## Contributing
|
|
|
|
### Start a Project Using Zig
|
|
|
|
One of the best ways you can contribute to Zig is to start using it for a
|
|
personal project. Here are some great examples:
|
|
|
|
* [Oxid](https://github.com/dbandstra/oxid) - arcade style game
|
|
* [TM35-Metronome](https://github.com/TM35-Metronome) - tools for modifying and randomizing Pokémon games
|
|
* [trOS](https://github.com/sjdh02/trOS) - tiny aarch64 baremetal OS thingy
|
|
|
|
Without fail, these projects lead to discovering bugs and helping flesh out use
|
|
cases, which lead to further design iterations of Zig. Importantly, each issue
|
|
found this way comes with real world motivations, so it is easy to explain
|
|
your reasoning behind proposals and feature requests.
|
|
|
|
Ideally, such a project will help you to learn new skills and add something
|
|
to your personal portfolio at the same time.
|
|
|
|
### Spread the Word
|
|
|
|
Another way to contribute is to write about Zig, or speak about Zig at a
|
|
conference, or do either of those things for your project which uses Zig.
|
|
Here are some examples:
|
|
|
|
* [Iterative Replacement of C with Zig](http://tiehuis.github.io/blog/zig1.html)
|
|
* [The Right Tool for the Right Job: Redis Modules & Zig](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCHM8-_poZY)
|
|
* [Writing a small ray tracer in Rust and Zig](https://nelari.us/post/raytracer_with_rust_and_zig/)
|
|
|
|
Zig is a brand new language, with no advertising budget. Word of mouth is the
|
|
only way people find out about the project, and the more people hear about it,
|
|
the more people will use it, and the better chance we have to take over the
|
|
world.
|
|
|
|
### Finding Contributor Friendly Issues
|
|
|
|
Please note that issues labeled
|
|
[Proposal](https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aproposal)
|
|
but do not also have the
|
|
[Accepted](https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aaccepted)
|
|
label are still under consideration, and efforts to implement such a proposal
|
|
have a high risk of being wasted. If you are interested in a proposal which is
|
|
still under consideration, please express your interest in the issue tracker,
|
|
providing extra insights and considerations that others have not yet expressed.
|
|
The most highly regarded argument in such a discussion is a real world use case.
|
|
|
|
The issue label
|
|
[Contributor Friendly](https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22contributor+friendly%22)
|
|
exists to help you find issues that are **limited in scope and/or
|
|
knowledge of Zig internals.**
|
|
|
|
### Editing Source Code
|
|
|
|
First, build the Stage 1 compiler as described in [Building from Source](README.md#Building-from-Source).
|
|
|
|
Zig locates lib files relative to executable path by searching up the
|
|
filesystem tree for a sub-path of `lib/zig/std/std.zig` or `lib/std/std.zig`.
|
|
Typically the former is an install and the latter a git working tree which
|
|
contains the build directory.
|
|
|
|
During development it is not necessary to perform installs when modifying
|
|
stage1 or userland sources and in fact it is faster and simpler to run,
|
|
test and debug from a git working tree.
|
|
|
|
- `make` is typically sufficient to build zig during development iterations.
|
|
- `make install` performs a build __and__ install.
|
|
- `msbuild -p:Configuration=Release INSTALL.vcxproj` on Windows performs a
|
|
build and install. To avoid install, pass cmake option `-DZIG_SKIP_INSTALL_LIB_FILES=ON`.
|
|
|
|
To test changes, do the following from the build directory:
|
|
|
|
1. Run `make` (on POSIX) or
|
|
`msbuild -p:Configuration=Release INSTALL.vcxproj` (on Windows).
|
|
2. `$BUILD_DIR/zig build test` (on POSIX) or
|
|
`$BUILD_DIR/Release\zig.exe build test` (on Windows).
|
|
|
|
That runs the whole test suite, which does a lot of extra testing that you
|
|
likely won't always need, and can take upwards of 1 hour. This is what the
|
|
CI server runs when you make a pull request. (Note: actually it runs a few
|
|
more tests; keep reading.)
|
|
|
|
To save time, you can add the `--help` option to the `zig build` command and
|
|
see what options are available. One of the most helpful ones is
|
|
`-Dskip-release`. Adding this option to the command in step 2 above will take
|
|
the time down from around 2 hours to about 6 minutes, and this is a good
|
|
enough amount of testing before making a pull request.
|
|
|
|
Another example is choosing a different set of things to test. For example,
|
|
`test-std` instead of `test` will only run the standard library tests, and
|
|
not the other ones. Combining this suggestion with the previous one, you could
|
|
do this:
|
|
|
|
`$BUILD_DIR/bin/zig build test-std -Dskip-release` (on POSIX) or
|
|
`$BUILD_DIR/Release\zig.exe build test-std -Dskip-release` (on Windows).
|
|
|
|
This will run only the standard library tests, in debug mode only, for all
|
|
targets (it will cross-compile the tests for non-native targets but not run
|
|
them).
|
|
|
|
When making changes to the compiler source code, the most helpful test step to
|
|
run is `test-behavior`. When editing documentation it is `docs`. You can find
|
|
this information and more in the `--help` menu.
|
|
|
|
#### Testing Non-Native Architectures with QEMU
|
|
|
|
The Linux CI server additionally has qemu installed and sets `-Denable-qemu`.
|
|
This provides test coverage for, e.g. aarch64 even on x86_64 machines. It's
|
|
recommended for Linux users to install qemu and enable this testing option
|
|
when editing the standard library or anything related to a non-native
|
|
architecture.
|
|
|
|
##### glibc
|
|
|
|
Testing foreign architectures with dynamically linked glibc is one step trickier.
|
|
This requires enabling `-Denable-foreign-glibc=/path/to/glibc/multi/install/glibcs`.
|
|
This path is obtained by building glibc for multiple architectures. This
|
|
process for me took an entire day to complete and takes up 65 GiB on my hard
|
|
drive. The CI server does not provide this test coverage. Instructions for
|
|
producing this path can be found
|
|
[on the wiki](https://github.com/ziglang/zig/wiki/Updating-libc#glibc).
|
|
Just the part with `build-many-glibcs.py`.
|
|
|
|
It's understood that most contributors will not have these tests enabled.
|
|
|
|
#### Testing Windows from a Linux Machine with Wine
|
|
|
|
When developing on Linux, another option is available to you: `-Denable-wine`.
|
|
This will enable running behavior tests and std lib tests with Wine. It's
|
|
recommended for Linux users to install Wine and enable this testing option
|
|
when editing the standard library or anything Windows-related.
|
|
|
|
#### Improving Translate-C
|
|
|
|
Please read the [Editing Source Code](#editing-source-code) section as a
|
|
prerequisite to this one.
|
|
|
|
`translate-c` is a feature provided by Zig that converts C source code into
|
|
Zig source code. It powers the `zig translate-c` command as well as
|
|
[@cImport](https://ziglang.org/documentation/master/#cImport), allowing Zig
|
|
code to not only take advantage of function prototypes defined in .h files,
|
|
but also `static inline` functions written in C, and even some macros.
|
|
|
|
This feature works by using libclang API to parse and semantically analyze
|
|
C/C++ files, and then based on the provided AST and type information,
|
|
generating Zig AST, and finally using the mechanisms of `zig fmt` to render
|
|
the Zig AST to a file.
|
|
|
|
The relevant tests for this feature are:
|
|
|
|
* `test/run_translated_c.zig` - each test case is C code with a `main` function. The C code
|
|
is translated into Zig code, compiled, and run, and tests that the expected output is the
|
|
same, and that the program exits cleanly. This kind of test coverage is preferred, when
|
|
possible, because it makes sure that the resulting Zig code is actually viable.
|
|
|
|
* `test/translate_c.zig` - each test case is C code, with a list of expected strings which
|
|
must be found in the resulting Zig code. This kind of test is more precise in what it
|
|
measures, but does not provide test coverage of whether the resulting Zig code is valid.
|
|
|
|
This feature is self-hosted, even though Zig is not fully self-hosted yet. In the Zig source
|
|
repo, we maintain a C API on top of Clang's C++ API:
|
|
|
|
* `src/zig_clang.h` - the C API that we maintain on top of Clang's C++ API. This
|
|
file does not include any Clang's C++ headers. Instead, C types and C enums are defined
|
|
here.
|
|
|
|
* `src/zig_clang.cpp` - a lightweight wrapper that fulfills the C API on top of the
|
|
C++ API. It takes advantage of `static_assert` to make sure we get compile errors when
|
|
Clang's C++ API changes. This one file necessarily does include Clang's C++ headers, which
|
|
makes it the slowest-to-compile source file in all of Zig's codebase.
|
|
|
|
* `src-self-hosted/clang.zig` - the Zig equivalent of `src/zig_clang.h`. This is a manually
|
|
maintained list of types and functions that are ABI-compatible with the Clang C API we
|
|
maintain. In theory this could be generated by running translate-c on `src/zig_clang.h`,
|
|
but that would introduce a dependency cycle, since we are using this file to implement
|
|
translate-c.
|
|
|
|
Finally, the actual source code for the translate-c feature is
|
|
`src-self-hosted/translate_c.zig`. This code uses the Clang C API exposed by
|
|
`src-self-hosted/clang.zig`, and produces Zig AST.
|
|
|
|
The steps for contributing to translate-c look like this:
|
|
|
|
1. Identify a test case you want to improve. Add it as a run-translated-c test
|
|
case (usually preferable), or as a translate-c test case.
|
|
|
|
2. Edit `src-self-hosted/translate_c.zig` to improve the behavior.
|
|
|
|
3. Run the relevant tests: `./zig build test-run-translated-c test-translate-c`
|