sinamas 1733b63057 gambatte_qt/gambattesource: drop use of volatile
the intention was probably to enforce ordering between stores to volatile
variables within the same thread, but that does not seem important here and
there's also no guarantee that they will be seen in that order from other
threads (which I knew so it must have been meant as an "increase probability"
thing), so it mostly just adds confusion and looks silly.
2013-02-27 22:20:58 +01:00
..
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00
2013-02-20 20:05:25 +01:00