Update ISSUE-LABELLING.md
Changes per further discussion in https://github.com/protocol/ipfs-dev-exp/pull/5 from the IPFS org proposal ... - Change `status/waiting` to `status/ready` to avoid implication of "don't touch, waiting for something" - Remove `effort/minutes`, `effort/day`, `effort/week` to avoid requiring folks to get too granular in their estimates - Remove `kind/improvement` in favor of `kind/enhancement` for both net-new features and improvements to existing features; it's a nuance that can be difficult to apply in reality.master
parent
c679b9340c
commit
93c888105f
|
@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ that allow submitters to set these labels.
|
|||
> Describes the nature of the issue.
|
||||
|
||||
* kind/bug
|
||||
* kind/improvement
|
||||
* kind/test
|
||||
* kind/tracking-issue
|
||||
* kind/question
|
||||
|
@ -151,12 +150,9 @@ Values and calibration guidance:
|
|||
|
||||
Values and calibration guidance:
|
||||
|
||||
* effort/minutes: minutes.
|
||||
* effort/hours: one or multiple hours.
|
||||
* effort/day: one day.
|
||||
* effort/days: multiple days.
|
||||
* effort/week: one week.
|
||||
* effort/weeks: multiple weeks.
|
||||
* effort/days: one or multiple days.
|
||||
* effort/weeks: one or multiple weeks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Impact (`impact/`)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -219,7 +215,7 @@ maintainers.
|
|||
* status/in-progress
|
||||
* status/blocked
|
||||
* status/inactive
|
||||
* status/waiting
|
||||
* status/ready
|
||||
* status/rotten
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation plan
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue