Previously, the design for the interaction between the encoder thread
and the graphics thread was that the encoder thread would signal to the
graphics thread when to start drawing each frame. The original idea
behind this was to prevent mutually cascading stalls of encoding or
graphics rendering (i.e., if rendering took too long, then encoding
would have to catch up, then rendering would have to catch up again, and
so on, cascading upon each other). The ultimate goal was to prevent
encoding from impacting graphics and vise versa.
However, eventually it was realized that there were some fundamental
flaws with this design.
1. Stray frame duplication. You could not guarantee that a frame would
render on time, so sometimes frames would unintentionally be lost if
there was any sort of minor hiccup or if the thread took too long to
be scheduled I'm guessing.
2. Frame timing in the rendering thread was less accurate. The only
place where frame timing was accurate was in the encoder thread, and
the graphics thread was at the whim of thread scheduling. On higher
end computers it was typically fine, but it was just generally not
guaranteed that a frame would be rendered when it was supposed to be
rendered.
So the solution (originally proposed by r1ch and paibox) is to instead
keep the encoding and graphics threads separate as usual, but instead of
the encoder thread controlling the graphics thread, the graphics thread
now controls the encoder thread. The encoder thread keeps a limited
cache of frames, then the graphics thread copies frames in to the cache
and increments a semaphore to schedule the encoder thread to encode that
data.
In the cache, each frame has an encode counter. If the frame cache is
full (e.g., the encoder taking too long to return frames), it will not
cache a new frame, but instead will just increment the counter on the
last frame in the cache to schedule that frame to encode again, ensuring
that frames are on time and reducing CPU usage by lowering video
complexity. If the graphics thread takes too long to render a frame,
then it will add that frame with the count value set to the total amount
of frames that were missed (actual legitimately duplicated frames).
Because the cache gives many frames of breathing room for the encoder to
encode frames, this design helps improve results especially when using
encoding presets that have higher complexity and CPU usage, minimizing
the risk of needlessly skipped or duplicated frames.
I also managed to sneak in what should be a bit of an optimization to
reduce copying of frame data, though how much of an optimization it
ultimately ends up being is debatable.
So to sum it up, this commit increases accuracy of frame timing,
completely removes stray frame duplication, gives better results for
higher complexity encoding presets, and potentially optimizes the frame
pipeline a tiny bit.
11106c2fce