Commit Graph

6 Commits (bf6e83821c03d6cbbccbb5b1a2e5424a6d228845)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Socapex 6dc84ad8fe Auto suggest scene and source names.
NameDialog can have placeholder text.
Localize scene number.
Pre-select scene and source text.
2014-05-12 15:01:51 -04:00
BtbN bb35d2ce09 Fix building on non-MSVC compilers
This function is inline, and QVariant uses a copy-on-write like copying mechanism, like most datatypes in Qt.
2014-01-24 18:56:33 +01:00
jp9000 afeed34b7a Change the UI to Qt (work in progress)
--------------------------------------------------
Notes and details
--------------------------------------------------
Why was this done?  Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas.  I
know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's
great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for
multiplatform applications.  It lacks in dialog editors, its code is
archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do
things with it.

Qt on the other hand..  I had to actually try Qt to realize how much
better it was as a toolkit.  They've got everything from dialog editors,
to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all
top-notch and highly maintained.  The focus of the toolkit is
application development, and they spend their time trying to help
people do exactly that:  make programs.  Great support, great tools,
and because of that, great toolkit.  I just didn't want to alienate any
developers by being stubborn about native widgets.

There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design
choices I disagree with though.  For example, I realize that to have an
easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation.
However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a
terrible way to approach the problem.  Even now I feel like there are a
variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic
management of things like that.  I don't like the idea of circumventing
the language itself like that.  It feels like one giant massive hack.

--------------------------------------------------
Things that aren't working properly:
--------------------------------------------------
 - Settings dialog is not implemented.  The dialog is complete but the
   code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet.

 - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on
   windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget
   automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video
   card failure that I don't understand.

 - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled
   until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a
   32x32 area.

 - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the
   viewport is messed up or something.  I'm sort of confused about
   what's going on with it.

 - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than
   the wxWidgets main window dialog did.  I'm not entirely sure what's
   going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within
   libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to
   be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables
   cross-thread)
2014-01-23 11:53:55 -07:00
Palana 4dfee68dd7 fix warnings in window-namedialog and mark methods as override 2014-01-01 04:06:59 +01:00
jp9000 c4af3e2a75 change obs_scene_destroy to obs_scene_release, add ability to add scenes, fix name dialog sizing 2013-12-29 08:54:06 -07:00
jp9000 e5ef03954e added name dialog code, moved 'using namespace std;' out of headers and into source files 2013-12-29 04:40:53 -07:00