credit to oss-fuzz
In rare circumstances, the block-splitter might cut a block at the exact beginning of a repcode.
In which case, since litlength=0, if the repcode expected 1+ literals in front, its signification changes.
This scenario is controlled in ZSTD_seqStore_resolveOffCodes(),
and the repcode is transformed into a raw offset when its new meaning is incorrect.
In more complex scenarios, the previous block might be emitted as uncompressed after all,
thus modifying the expected repcode history.
In the case discovered by oss-fuzz, the first block is emitted as uncompressed,
so the repcode history remains at default values: 1,4,8.
But since the starting repcode is repcode3, and the literal length is == 0,
its meaning is : = repcode1 - 1.
Since repcode1==1, it results in an offset value of 0, which is invalid.
So that's what the `assert()` was verifying : the result of the repcode translation should be a valid offset.
But actually, it doesn't matter, because this result will then be compared to reality,
and since it's an invalid offset, it will necessarily be discarded if incorrect,
then the repcode will be replaced by a raw offset.
So the `assert()` is not useful.
Furthermore, it's incorrect, because it assumes this situation cannot happen, but it does, as described in above scenario.
8df1257c3c