Merge pull request #2726 from terrelln/oss-fuzz-fix
[bug-fix] Fix a determinism bug with the DUBT
This commit is contained in:
commit
d2b5e5496d
@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ typedef struct {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
} ZSTD_window_t;
|
||||
|
||||
#define ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX 2
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct ZSTD_matchState_t ZSTD_matchState_t;
|
||||
|
||||
#define ZSTD_ROW_HASH_CACHE_SIZE 8 /* Size of prefetching hash cache for row-based matchfinder */
|
||||
@ -884,9 +886,9 @@ MEM_STATIC void ZSTD_window_clear(ZSTD_window_t* window)
|
||||
|
||||
MEM_STATIC U32 ZSTD_window_isEmpty(ZSTD_window_t const window)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return window.dictLimit == 1 &&
|
||||
window.lowLimit == 1 &&
|
||||
(window.nextSrc - window.base) == 1;
|
||||
return window.dictLimit == ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX &&
|
||||
window.lowLimit == ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX &&
|
||||
(window.nextSrc - window.base) == ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -1149,11 +1151,12 @@ ZSTD_checkDictValidity(const ZSTD_window_t* window,
|
||||
|
||||
MEM_STATIC void ZSTD_window_init(ZSTD_window_t* window) {
|
||||
ZSTD_memset(window, 0, sizeof(*window));
|
||||
window->base = (BYTE const*)"";
|
||||
window->dictBase = (BYTE const*)"";
|
||||
window->dictLimit = 1; /* start from 1, so that 1st position is valid */
|
||||
window->lowLimit = 1; /* it ensures first and later CCtx usages compress the same */
|
||||
window->nextSrc = window->base + 1; /* see issue #1241 */
|
||||
window->base = (BYTE const*)" ";
|
||||
window->dictBase = (BYTE const*)" ";
|
||||
ZSTD_STATIC_ASSERT(ZSTD_DUBT_UNSORTED_MARK < ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX); /* Start above ZSTD_DUBT_UNSORTED_MARK */
|
||||
window->dictLimit = ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX; /* start from >0, so that 1st position is valid */
|
||||
window->lowLimit = ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX; /* it ensures first and later CCtx usages compress the same */
|
||||
window->nextSrc = window->base + ZSTD_WINDOW_START_INDEX; /* see issue #1241 */
|
||||
window->nbOverflowCorrections = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user