Nits
This commit is contained in:
parent
22875ece61
commit
3620a0a565
@ -175,9 +175,9 @@ size_t ZSTD_compressBlock_doubleFast_noDict_generic(
|
||||
} while (ip1 <= ilimit);
|
||||
|
||||
_cleanup:
|
||||
/* If offset_1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 > 0) and became valid (offset_1 > 0),
|
||||
* rotate saved offsets. */
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 > 0) & (offset_1 > 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
/* If offset_1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 != 0) and became valid (offset_1 != 0),
|
||||
* rotate saved offsets. See comment in ZSTD_compressBlock_fast_noDict for more context. */
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 != 0) && (offset_1 != 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
|
||||
/* save reps for next block */
|
||||
rep[0] = offset_1 ? offset_1 : offsetSaved1;
|
||||
|
@ -254,9 +254,20 @@ _cleanup:
|
||||
* However, it seems to be a meaningful performance hit to try to search
|
||||
* them. So let's not. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* If rep_offset1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 > 0) and became valid (rep_offset1 > 0),
|
||||
* rotate saved offsets. */
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 > 0) & (rep_offset1 > 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
/* When the repcodes are outside of the prefix, we set them to zero before the loop.
|
||||
* When the offsets are still zero, we need to restore them after the block to have a correct
|
||||
* repcode history. If only one offset was invalid, it is easy. The tricky case is when both
|
||||
* offsets were invalid. We need to figure out which offset to refill with.
|
||||
* - If both offsets are zero they are in the same order.
|
||||
* - If both offsets are non-zero, we won't restore the offsets from `offsetSaved[12]`.
|
||||
* - If only one is zero, we need to decide which offset to restore.
|
||||
* - If rep_offset1 is non-zero, then rep_offset2 must be offsetSaved1.
|
||||
* - It is impossible for rep_offset2 to be non-zero.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* So if rep_offset1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 != 0) and became valid (rep_offset1 != 0), then
|
||||
* set rep[0] = rep_offset1 and rep[1] = offsetSaved1.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 != 0) && (rep_offset1 != 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
|
||||
/* save reps for next block */
|
||||
rep[0] = rep_offset1 ? rep_offset1 : offsetSaved1;
|
||||
@ -762,9 +773,9 @@ _cleanup:
|
||||
* However, it seems to be a meaningful performance hit to try to search
|
||||
* them. So let's not. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* If offset_1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 > 0) and became valid (offset_1 > 0),
|
||||
* rotate saved offsets. */
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 > 0) & (offset_1 > 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
/* If offset_1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 != 0) and became valid (offset_1 != 0),
|
||||
* rotate saved offsets. See comment in ZSTD_compressBlock_fast_noDict for more context. */
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 != 0) && (offset_1 != 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
|
||||
/* save reps for next block */
|
||||
rep[0] = offset_1 ? offset_1 : offsetSaved1;
|
||||
|
@ -1682,9 +1682,9 @@ _storeSequence:
|
||||
continue; /* faster when present ... (?) */
|
||||
} } }
|
||||
|
||||
/* If offset_1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 > 0) and became valid (offset_1 > 0),
|
||||
* rotate saved offsets. */
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 > 0) & (offset_1 > 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
/* If offset_1 started invalid (offsetSaved1 != 0) and became valid (offset_1 != 0),
|
||||
* rotate saved offsets. See comment in ZSTD_compressBlock_fast_noDict for more context. */
|
||||
offsetSaved2 = ((offsetSaved1 != 0) && (offset_1 != 0)) ? offsetSaved1 : offsetSaved2;
|
||||
|
||||
/* save reps for next block */
|
||||
rep[0] = offset_1 ? offset_1 : offsetSaved1;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user