Common Mistakes: Improvements

master
Ezhh 2018-10-03 18:58:35 +01:00 committed by rubenwardy
parent d66da62fdb
commit 0c5f2e8d68
1 changed files with 23 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ redirect_from: /en/chapters/common_mistakes.html
## Introduction
This chapter will detail common mistakes that are made, and how to avoid them.
This chapter details common mistakes, and how to avoid them.
* [Never Store ObjectRefs (ie: players or entities)](#never-store-objectrefs-ie-players-or-entities)
* [Don't Trust Formspec Submissions](#dont-trust-formspec-submissions)
@ -16,16 +16,17 @@ This chapter will detail common mistakes that are made, and how to avoid them.
## Never Store ObjectRefs (ie: players or entities)
If the Object a ObjectRef represents is deleted - for example, the player goes
offline or the entity is unloaded - then calling any methods will result in a crash.
If the object an ObjectRef represents is deleted - for example, if the player goes
offline or the entity is unloaded - then calling methods on that object
will result in a crash.
Don't do this:
For example, don't do this:
```lua
minetest.register_on_joinplayer(function(player)
local function func()
local pos = player:get_pos() -- BAD!
-- `player` is stored in the scope then accessed later.
-- `player` is stored then accessed later.
-- If the player leaves in that second, the server *will* crash.
end
@ -33,13 +34,13 @@ minetest.register_on_joinplayer(function(player)
foobar[player:get_player_name()] = player
-- RISKY
-- It's recommended to just not do this
-- use minetest.get_connected_players() and
-- minetest.get_player_by_name() instead.
-- It's not recommended to do this.
-- Use minetest.get_connected_players() and
-- minetest.get_player_by_name() instead.
end)
```
instead, do this:
Do this:
```lua
minetest.register_on_joinplayer(function(player)
@ -64,8 +65,8 @@ end)
Malicious clients can submit formspecs whenever they like with whatever content
they like.
The following code has a vulnerability where any player can give
themselves moderator privileges:
For example, the following code has a vulnerability which will allow players to
give themselves moderator privileges:
```lua
local function show_formspec(name)
@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ minetest.register_on_player_receive_fields(function(player,
end)
```
Instead, do this:
Add a privilege check to solve this:
```lua
minetest.register_on_player_receive_fields(function(player,
@ -108,12 +109,12 @@ end)
## Set ItemStacks After Changing Them
Notice how it's simply called an `ItemStack` in the API, not an `ItemStackRef`,
similar to `InvRef`. This is because an `ItemStack` isn't a reference - it's a
Have you noticed that it's simply called an `ItemStack` in the API, not an `ItemStackRef`,
similar to `InvRef`? This is because an `ItemStack` isn't a reference - it's a
copy. Stacks work on a copy of the data rather than the stack in the inventory.
This means that modifying a stack won't actually modify that stack in the inventory.
Don't do this:
For example, don't do this:
```lua
local inv = player:get_inventory()
@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ inv:set_stack("main", 1, stack)
-- Correct! Item stack is set
```
The behaviour of callbacks is slightly more complicated. Modifying an itemstack you
The behaviour of callbacks is slightly more complicated. Modifying an `ItemStack` you
are given will change it for the caller too, and any subsequent callbacks. However,
it will only be saved in the engine if the callback caller sets it.
@ -147,8 +148,10 @@ minetest.register_on_item_eat(function(hp_change, replace_with_item,
end)
```
If no callbacks cancel, then the stack will be set and the description will be updated.
If a callback cancels, then the update may be lost. It's better to do this instead:
If no callbacks cancel this, the stack will be set and the description will be updated,
but if a callback cancels this, then the update may be lost.
It's better to do this instead:
```lua
minetest.register_on_item_eat(function(hp_change, replace_with_item,
@ -161,6 +164,6 @@ end)
```
If the callbacks cancel or the callback runner doesn't set the stack,
then our update will still be set.
If the callbacks or the callback runner does set the stack, then our
then the update will still be set.
If the callbacks or the callback runner set the stack, then the use of
set_stack doesn't matter.