This is a mega-commit - because most of it had to be done in one go
otherwise some commits would fail to compile - that attempts to fix a
few problems with Geany's includes as well as various other related
cleanups. After this change it's easier to use includes and there's
little worry about which order things are included in or who includes
what.
Overview of changes:
* Include config.h at the start of each source file if HAVE_CONFIG_H
is defined (and never in headers).
* Go through each source file and make the includes section generally
like this:
- Always config.h first as above
- Then if the file has a header with the same name, include that
- Then include in alphabetical order each other internal/geany header.
- Then include standard headers
- Then include non-standard system headers
- Then include GLib/GTK+ related stuff
* Doing as above makes it easier to find implicit header include
dependencies and it exposed quite a few weird problems with includes
or forward declarations, fix those.
* Make geany.h contain not much besides some defines.
- Add a little header file "app.h" for GeanyApp and move it there
- Move "app" global to new "app.h" file
- Move "ignore_callback" global to "callbacks.h"
- Move "geany_object" global to "geanyobject.h"
* Add an include in "geany.h" for "app.h" since GeanyApp used to be
defined there and some plugins included this header to access
GeanyApp.
* Include "gtkcompat.h" everywhere instead of gtk/gtk.h so that
everywhere sees the same definitions (not a problem in practice AFAIK
so this could be changed back if better that way.
* Remove forward declarations from previous commits as some people
apparently consider this bad style, despite that it reduces inter-
header dependencies.
TODO:
* As always, to test on win32
* As always, to test with not Autotools
* Test plugins better, both builtin and geany-plugins, likely API/ABI bump
* Test with various defines/flags that may change what is included
* win32.[ch] not really touched since I couldn't test
When switching between MRU documents, Geany pops up a dialog about
document change even for the intermediate non-final documents.
This leads to both reload dialog and document switch dialog displayed
at the same time and termination of document switching because the
newly displayed dialog takes focus.
This patch disables reload checks for the intermediate documents and
forces reload check for the final document.
This is a pretty frequent work pattern of mine:
1. Editing file A
2. Searching for function and opening file B
3. Closing file B because I just wanted to look at the function definition
4. Without this patch I get to the file following the B's tab (which
is just a random file) but my brain expects that I get to A
I know it's possible to kind of simulate the behaviour I want with
the "next to current" placement option but I really don't see a single
advantage of having tabs closed in sequential order. This is also
why I didn't make this behaviour optional. But maybe I miss some
use case of tabs being closed sequentially - just tell me.
Signed-off-by: Jiří Techet <techet@gmail.com>
Instead we should use that tab which is under mouse cursor where the user clicked (this might be a
different one than the current document). To be able to do so, we need to handle the right-click signal
per tab not on the GtkNotebook tab area to identify the tab under the mouse cursor.
* Processed with rstrip-whitespace.py script added to scripts/ directory.
* Script run on all .c and .h files in src/ and plugins/ directories.
* Also remove more than one newline at the end of files.
