Commit Graph

15 Commits (ac8898e68150fc9cd2bc04ee6c4ef4d3005b8c27)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jimmi Holst Christensen 378d3e4403
Solve the return type ambiguity (#1628)
Changed container and initializer syntax
* <container> { ... } -> <container> . { ... }
* <exrp> { ... } -> <expr> . { ...}
2018-10-15 09:51:15 -04:00
Andrew Kelley c06a61e9bf
remove `this`. add `@This()`.
closes #1283
2018-09-13 16:34:33 -04:00
Marc Tiehuis a7527389cc Make poly1305 and x25519 more idiomatic zig
This also adjusts the current hash/hmac functions to have a consistent
interface allowing easier switching/testing.
2018-08-31 18:40:09 +12:00
Andrew Kelley 7912061226 remove integer and float casting syntax
* add `@intCast`
 * add `@floatCast`
 * add `@floatToInt`
 * add `@intToFloat`

See #1061
2018-06-17 02:57:07 -04:00
Andrew Kelley fcbb7426fa use * for pointer type instead of &
See #770

To help automatically translate code, see the
zig-fmt-pointer-reform-2 branch.

This will convert all & into *. Due to the syntax
ambiguity (which is why we are making this change),
even address-of & will turn into *, so you'll have
to manually fix thes instances. You will be guaranteed
to get compile errors for them - expected 'type', found 'foo'
2018-05-31 17:28:07 -04:00
Andrew Kelley ea58f4a5a9 run zig fmt on the codebase 2018-05-30 16:09:11 -04:00
Andrew Kelley b184ae5ca5 run zig fmt on some of the codebase
See #1003
2018-05-26 23:00:29 -04:00
Marc Tiehuis f68c2e0a14 Fix off-by-one error in all crypto functions 2018-04-04 21:32:23 +12:00
Marc Tiehuis 7a893691c0 Unroll Sha3 inner loop
Issue #699 since fixed. Nearly a x3 perf improvement.

Using --release-fast.

Sha3_256 (before): 96 Mb/s
Sha3_256  (after): 267 Mb/s

Sha3_512 (before): 53 Mb/s
Sha3_512  (after): 142 Mb/s

No real gains from unrolling other initialization loops in crypto
functions so have been left as is.
2018-03-10 10:00:07 +13:00
Andrew Kelley 3671582c15 syntax: functions require return type. remove `->`
The purpose of this is:

 * Only one way to do things
 * Changing a function with void return type to return a possible
   error becomes a 1 character change, subtly encouraging
   people to use errors.

See #632

Here are some imperfect sed commands for performing this update:

remove arrow:

```
sed -i 's/\(\bfn\b.*\)-> /\1/g' $(find . -name "*.zig")
```

add void:

```
sed -i 's/\(\bfn\b.*\))\s*{/\1) void {/g' $(find ../ -name "*.zig")
```

Some cleanup may be necessary, but this should do the bulk of the work.
2018-01-25 04:10:11 -05:00
Marc Tiehuis dfd5363494 Add throughput test program
Blake performance numbers for reference:

```
Cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz
```

-- Blake2s

```
Zig --release-fast
    485 Mb/s
Zig --release-safe
    377 Mb/s
Zig
    11 Mb/s
```

-- Blake2b
```
Zig --release-fast
    616 Mb/s
Zig --release-safe
    573 Mb/s
Zig
    18 Mb/s
```
2018-01-17 21:19:45 +13:00
Marc Tiehuis fa7b33549e Change crypto functions to fill a buffer
- Rename blake2x -> blake2
 - Fix blake2s truncated tests
2018-01-17 00:17:48 +13:00
Marc Tiehuis 9be9f1ad20 Disable win32 tests for Sha2 + correct lengths 2018-01-14 09:58:30 +13:00
Marc Tiehuis 1f3ed5cf27 Change indexing variable types for crypto functions 2018-01-13 22:44:58 +13:00
Marc Tiehuis 51fdbf7f8c Add Md5 and Sha1 hash functions
Some performance comparisons to C.

We take the fastest time measurement taken across multiple runs.

The block hashing functions use the same md5/sha1 methods.

```
Cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz
Gcc: 7.2.1 20171224
Clang: 5.0.1
Zig: 0.1.1.304f6f1d
```

See https://www.nayuki.io/page/fast-md5-hash-implementation-in-x86-assembly:

```
gcc -O2
    661 Mb/s
clang -O2
    490 Mb/s
zig --release-fast and zig --release-safe
    570 Mb/s
zig
    50 Mb/s
```

See https://www.nayuki.io/page/fast-sha1-hash-implementation-in-x86-assembly:

```
gcc -O2
    588 Mb/s
clang -O2
    563 Mb/s
zig --release-fast and zig --release-safe
    610 Mb/s
zig
    21 Mb/s
```

In short, zig provides pretty useful tools for writing this sort of
code. We are in the lead against clang (which uses the same LLVM
backend) with us being slower only against md5 with GCC.
2018-01-13 14:40:21 +13:00