Reverting the let.expr syntax (no consensus on the proposal). Sorry for the noise.

git-svn-id: http://caml.inria.fr/svn/ocaml/trunk@11960 f963ae5c-01c2-4b8c-9fe0-0dff7051ff02

Changes

@@ -12,8 +12,6 @@ Language features:
   Using the -principal option guarantees forward compatibility.
 - New (module M) and (module M : S) syntax in patterns, for immediate
   unpacking of a first-class module.
-- New syntax "let.e0 p = e1 in e2" where e0 is a simple expression,
-  expanded to "e0 e1 (fun p -> e2).
 
 Compilers:
 - Revised simplification of let-alias (PR#5205, PR#5288)

parsing/parser.mly

@@ -982,9 +982,6 @@ expr:
       { mkexp(Pexp_apply($1, List.rev $2)) }
   | LET rec_flag let_bindings IN seq_expr
       { mkexp(Pexp_let($2, List.rev $3, $5)) }
-  | LET DOT simple_expr let_binding IN seq_expr
-      { let (pat, expr) = $4 in
-        mkexp(Pexp_apply($3, ["", expr;  "", ghexp(Pexp_function("", None, [pat, $6]))])) }
   | LET MODULE UIDENT module_binding IN seq_expr
       { mkexp(Pexp_letmodule($3, $4, $6)) }
   | LET OPEN mod_longident IN seq_expr